Laboratory Professionals Member Community

This community is for ASCP laboratory professional members and is aligned with those membership categories.

 View Only
  • 1.  Enquiry: How do your facility handle failed/unsuccessful Proficiency testing event

    Posted 06-21-2024 14:47

    I'm keen to learn how your various facility(s) handle failed Proficiency testing events: a bit of the root cause analysis and what steps are taken by the management team, regarding the staff/analyst involved in the failed. 



    ------------------------------
    Silas Ogutu Technologist/Scientist, non-supervisor (CT,MLS,MT)
    Lyons GA
    (711)788-386
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Enquiry: How do your facility handle failed/unsuccessful Proficiency testing event

    ASCP Ambassador
    Posted 06-22-2024 00:58
    Hello Silas Ogutu,

    Proficiency testing (PT) is an objective system for evaluating a laboratory's performance, conducted by an independent body. It is a mandatory accreditation requirement that helps laboratories improve their operations. The main causes of poor PT performance were:

    -         The sufficiency of training to the professional

    -         The failure to address nonconformities,

    -         Report results without proper units,  

    -         Unavailability of reagents.

    -         Inadequate daily internal quality control and equipment issues also impacted PT outcomes.

    To maintain certification and continually enhance quality, participating laboratories should prioritize addressing these areas for improvement.






  • 3.  RE: Enquiry: How do your facility handle failed/unsuccessful Proficiency testing event

    Posted 06-22-2024 07:46
      |   view attached

    Hello Silas,

    The action taken really depends on the failure, but it's a learning opportunity for all staff.  We do typically document the failure in the staff member's record. If it's something like an incorrectly identified cell, that presents an opportunity to share those pictures to all staff members. If it's a simple mix-up of labeling (i.e.#3 sample was labeled as #1, etc) that would be a different approach more directed to the individual but potentially a good reminder for all staff since that overlook example could happen with patient samples if not taking care.

    With any failure, you want to do a complete investigation to see if it was pre-analytic, analytic, or post-analytic issue and delve into what needs done from there. 

    The other thing to check with numeric responses, even with acceptable results, is bias and differences in the SDI. While it's good to see results on both sides of the peer mean, they shouldn't be too far off the mean. If they are, it's something else to check into. We typically use anything greater than a 1.5 SDI. 

    As with all of this, regular QC monitoring to peer means (when possible) helps to avoid truly analytical or test quality issues when it comes to PT.  I attached our investigation form as a tool we use to help identify the type of error that occurred and guide staff/management to appropriate remedies. I would involve staff in the investigation whenever possible so they can understand the importance and relevance of the PT. 

    Hope that helps and gives you another source of information to pick from. I'm sure others will have more detail.

    Good luck!



    ------------------------------
    Jonathan Perry, MLS(ASCP)
    President
    ASCP West Virginia Chapter
    ------------------------------

    Attachment(s)



  • 4.  RE: Enquiry: How do your facility handle failed/unsuccessful Proficiency testing event

    Posted 06-23-2024 08:51
    In addition to the excellent points Jonathan highlighted, the root cause analysis should involve addressing gaps in the competency training of the staff involved. In my Trust, before one is assigned to analyze a PT or EQA scheme sample, he/she must have been certified competent in handling that assay and the analyser used. Also important to address, is the ability of the staff that carried out an oversight of the analysis/documentation performed by the main staff. If it's ascertained that the staff was signed off competent, a re-training on the affected aspect is initiated and followed up.
    Ogochukwu Okoh
    Royal Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, UK